Accession: L01626
Editorial Title: Mary Baker Eddy to Alfred Farlow, May 16, 1901
Author: Mary Baker Eddy 
Recipient: Alfred Farlow 
Annotator: Alfred Farlow 
Date: May 16, 1901
Manuscript Description: Handwritten by Mary Baker Eddy on unlined Pleasant View stationery from Concord, New Hampshire.
Archival Note: This letter includes a notation in the handwriting of Alfred Farlow.
Final Edits
Original Document

Click image to magnify
Full
Back
Close
View Document
View Image
L01626
-
Reproduced from the archive of The Mary Baker Eddy Library
Handshift:Alfred Farlow140
My dear Student

The last mystery (not of Pleasant View) is - Mr. Clark's saying he apologized to me for two contradicting articles! He has not. Why I was astounded at the "explanation of my successor" not appearing with your last article in the HeraldEditorial Note: New York Herald was that as near as I remember I charged Mr. Frye last Monday or Tuesday to telegraph to you that I wished to have it appear in you copy for the Herald. He, Mr. Frye, does not remember this so it must be that he did forget to wire you. Excuse my surprise expressed in letter. I knew if anyoneAs Written:any one but me answered that question it would be made stock for jests and never stopped till I was heard from. It has been in the papers that I was drilling Mr Frye for my successor.

The article from the West relative to you is fine I think much of it and shall keep it. This whirlpool of stuff in the press is only to affect the lawsuit pending trialEditorial Note: This is a reference to a libel suit against Mary Baker Eddy by Josephine Curtis Woodbury. The suit was filed on July 31, 1899 and concluded in Eddy's favor on June 5, 1901. The editors of papers do not know why they are so mesmerized Be as cool and comfortable as you can You surprise me with your calmness

With love
M B Eddy
L01626
-
Reproduced from the archive of The Mary Baker Eddy Library
Handshift:Alfred Farlow140
My dear Student

The last mystery (not of Pleasant View) is - Mr. Clark's saying he apologized to me for two contradicting articles! He has not. Why I was astounded at the "explanation of my successor" not appearing with your last article in the HeraldEditorial Note: New York Herald was that as near as I remember I charged Mr. Frye last Monday or Tuesday to telegraph to you that I wished to have it appear in you copy for the Herald. He, Mr. Frye, does not remember this so it must be that he did forget to wire you. Excuse my surprise expressed in letter. I knew if any oneCorrected:anyone but me answered that question it would be made stock for jes [?] Unclear or illegible ts and never stopped till I was heard from. It has been in the papers that I was drilling Mr Frye for my successor.

The article from the West relative to you is fine I think much of it and shall keep it. This whirlpool of stuff in the press is only to affect the lawsuit pending trialEditorial Note: This is a reference to a libel suit against Mary Baker Eddy by Josephine Curtis Woodbury. The suit was filed on July 31, 1899 and concluded in Eddy's favor on June 5, 1901. The editors of papers do not know why they are so mesmerized Be as cool and comfortable as you can You surprise me with your calmness

With love
M B Eddy
 
View Image
 

Back Text

Shown for development purposes only
New York Herald This is a reference to a libel suit against Mary Baker Eddy by Josephine Curtis Woodbury. The suit was filed on July 31, 1899 and concluded in Eddy's favor on June 5, 1901.