You are mentally in the dilemma As Written: dilemna that both the Judean As Written: Judian religion and the gospel are true. Jesus said to the Pharisees "Why did David call him
Lord?"Matt 22:41 ¶While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, Matt 22:42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The son of David. Matt 22:43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, Matt 22:44 The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
Matt 22:45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? Matt 22:46 And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions. They could not see that Mind is all they believed in both mind and
matter hence their muddle over the genealogy of JesusEditorial Note: Two genealogies of Jesus Christ are given in the
New Testament, one in the gospel of MatthewMatt 1:1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. Matt 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;
Matt 1:3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and
Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; Matt 1:4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and
Aminadab begat
Naasson; and
Naasson begat Salmon; Matt 1:5 And Salmon begat Booz of
Rachab; and
Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; Matt 1:6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; Matt 1:7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and
Roboam begat
Abia; and
Abia begat Asa; Matt 1:8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and
Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat
Ozias; Matt 1:9 And Ozias begat
Joatham; and
Joatham begat
Achaz; and
Achaz begat
Ezekias; Matt 1:10 And Ezekias begat
Manasses; and
Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; Matt 1:11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: Matt 1:12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat
Salathiel; and
Salathiel begat
Zorobabel; Matt 1:13 And Zorobabel begat
Abiud; and
Abiud begat
Eliakim; and
Eliakim begat
Azor; Matt 1:14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat
Achim; and
Achim begat
Eliud; Matt 1:15 And Eliud begat
Eleazar; and
Eleazar begat
Matthan; and
Matthan begat Jacob; Matt 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called
Christ. Matt 1:17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations. and the other in the gospel of LukeLuke 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the
son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, Luke 3:24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph, Luke 3:25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of
Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of
Nagge, Luke 3:26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of
Mattathias, which was the son of
Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda, Luke 3:27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of
Salathiel, which was the son of Neri, Luke 3:28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of
Elmodam, which was the son of Er, Luke 3:29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of
Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, Luke 3:30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim, Luke 3:31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of
Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David, Luke 3:32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of
Naasson, Luke 3:33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of
Phares, which was the son of Juda, Luke 3:34 Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor, Luke 3:35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of
Ragau, which was the son of
Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala, Luke 3:36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of
Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of
Noe, which was the son of
Lamech, Luke 3:37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of
Maleleel, which was the son of
Cainan, Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God. . They differ significantly from each
other..
You, dear one, know theoretically that all is Mind and that brings you to know the danger of the two classifications held as parallelisms As Written: parellelisms and are wise enough to say as Jesus said to his disciples "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them nowJohn 16:12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. John 16, 12.
This line of demarcation is so sensitive As Written: sensative to deflection that I alone of all the world, save the MasterEditorial Note: Jesus Christ, have seen and followed the intermediate in my attempt to speak of the real and of the unreal while I leave the impression on thought of the allness of the one and the nothingness of the other.
I could teach even you the new tongueMark 16:17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; so far beyond what I have hitherto spoken it to you that it would confuse you but I avoid this just as you would avoid materializing mortal thought by the material genealogy that was never in reality but only the mirage of the deflection of God's reflection.
There is a class of materialists to which the classification of material generation pointing up to the throne of David would be not only acceptable if they were generous enough to admit it but a pretext to the genuineness of my commission as God's anointed. Thus to reach both classes of thinkers the matter physician and the metaphysician your literary work on this subject to avoid harming the one and disgusting the other must be much as you would treat a patient.
Prepare the thought by this mode of explanation which I have indicated and practiced so many years namely: State the reality of Mind, Spirit, and its classifications in the manifestations of the Infinite and the unreality of the simulating claims of matter and its classifications through birth growth maturity and decay. Leave upon the mind of your reader the same impression that you would give to your patient namely that Mind and its manifestations are all and the only reality and that the claims of matter and its manifestations are unreal and only named to satisfy the human thought in its upward tendency and [*]Archival Note: The following text was later added to the document by the author or another annotator, disrupting the surrounding thought.?[*]Archival Note: End floating text. real reign from sense to Soul
[*]Archival Note: A horizontal line in drawn here.
Note
Do not put your article into the Journal but into a pamphlet and I will give you permission to publish this letter to you in your pamphlet when the letter is properly arranged for publication. I have dictated it to Mr. Frye in a half hour. So you see the need of preparing it properly before publishing it for the inspection of minds unfamiliar with our topic.